Dr. Orly Taitz Esquire: Leading the Obama Eligibility Challenge

Kuuleme T. Stephens

Kuuleme T. Stephens

I often publish links on my Facebook Page that have to do with the Dr. Orly Taitz Esquire cases against the US President Barrack Obama.

For those of you who don’t know who Dr. Orly Taitz Esquire “ is a leading figure in the “birther” movement, which challenges whether Barack Obama is a natural-born citizen eligible to serve as President of the United States. She has also run for state-wide office in California twice and is a dentist, lawyer,[8] and former real estate agent.[9][10] She also promotes a number of other allegations both related and unrelated to Obama, and has initiated a number of lawsuits on behalf of the “birther” movement.” According to Wikipedia.



Her legal actions against Obama started in November of 2008 with Keyes v. Bowen. She Filed on behalf of the independent presidential candidate Alan Keyes suing California’s secretary of state for allegedly failing to ascertain Obama’s eligibility for president before placing him on the ballot. She ended up losing that case as it was dismissed on May 4, 2009.


She went on to file similar cases such as:

Lightfoot v. Bowen (http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/08a524.htm)

Barnett v. Obama (http://www.scribd.com/collections/2942847/Barnett-v-Obama)

Cook v. Good (http://www.scribd.com/doc/24050442/Cook-v-Good-09-14698-Docket)

Rhodes v. MacDonald (http://dockets.justia.com/docket/georgia/gamdce/4:2009cv00106/77605/)

Taitz v. Obama (http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/district-of-columbia/dcdce/1:2010cv00151/140567/38)

Taitz v. Astrue (http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/district-of-columbia/dcdce/1:2011cv00402/146770/39)

Taitz v. Fuddy (http://www.scribd.com/collections/3231957/TAITZ-v-FUDDY-et-al-Hawaii-Circuit-Court)

and  Taitz v. Ruemmler (http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/district-of-columbia/dcdce/1:2011cv01421/149529/6)

She challenged many Primary races as well. The primaries challenged were the 2012 New Hampshire primary, the 2012 Georgia primary, the 2012 Alabama primary, the 2012 Indiana primary, and the 2012 Mississippi primary. She also challenged several General Elections. Those challenged were the 2012 Indiana general election, the 2012 Kansas general election, and the 2012 Mississippi general election.

Orly Taitz has a website where you can follow her endeavors located at:



The case I am interested the most in is the Edward Noonan, et al v. Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State, and the Justices. 

“The case in question is Edward Noonan, et al v. Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State, and the Justices are finally looking at it thanks to the dogged determination of Orly Taitz. The case calls into question many of the documents Obama (Bounel, Soetoro, Soebarkah, etc.) has used and/or released as authentic since he came on the national scene. The case contends that the documents — birth certificate, Social Security number, Selective Service registration, etc. — are fakes or forgeries. If that’s the case, Obama should not have been on the California ballot in 2008 and, therefore, should not have received the State’s electoral votes.”


I have been following this case for some time now and asking the people on my Facebook Page if they think this will change anything or anything will be done.  The majority of people think that this case won’t matter at all. They think that the case will be thrown out like all the other cases that have been brought against the Teflon POTUS. I would have to tend to agree.

I think the Supreme Court (even if all the proof were up in their faces laid out on a silver platter) would protect the Democrat Messiah. Even though it seems that the Supreme Court has agreed to expedite the decision in this case, I think they did it more so just to give the people false hope in the hopes it would show that they know we are watching them, rule against it, and get it off the table quicker.


If the Supreme Court were to rule in favor of Obama being ineligible, it would be a fantastic thing for the American People. After all, everything he’s done to this Country and every order he has given would indeed be overturned. It would also give “We the People” the chance to start over from scratch and get this Country back to where it needs to be.

However, what people have to understand is that this would be a first for our Country. We would be without representation as a Country until we could get all of this mess straightened out. If I am not mistaken, should we actually get the chance to clean house, the highest ranking Military General would be the one to assume the responsibilities of POTUS, until we could have elections to replace an entire administration.

If the Supreme Court were to rule Obama ineligible, that would open the door to a whole new can of worms that they (the Supreme Court Justices) may view this Country to be not ready for. If they did rule in favor of Obama being ineligible, that would open the door for the entire Administration and our Elected Officials of Congress (including some of our own Republicans) to lose their seats and be sued as well, for playing apart in the cover-up of Obama’s eligibility. That would mean we would be without representation of a Congress until new elections could occur as well.

Do I think we are ready for such a task?? YES! But I alone, am not the entire Country! I myself think that we need to start from scratch if we are to save this Country.

Sit back and think about it for a minute yourselves.

Do you think we are ready for such a task as a Country?


There has been a report of documents being with-held by Supreme Court Staff. You can read about that here:



9 thoughts on “Dr. Orly Taitz Esquire: Leading the Obama Eligibility Challenge

  1. Amazing things here. I’m very satisfied to look your post. Thank you a lot and I’m taking a look ahead
    to touch you. Will you please drop me a mail?

  2. I believe joe biden would still take the helm but if for some reason he were not elligible then why would it not go to john boehner?

  3. Defaulting means he loses!

    The line of succession are clear, it is the Vice president,
    •Speaker of the House of Representatives
    •President Pro Tempore of the Senate
    •Secretary of State
    •Secretary of the Treasury
    •Secretary of Defense
    •Attorney General
    •Secretary of the Interior
    •Secretary of Agriculture
    •Secretary of Commerce
    •Secretary of Labor
    •Secretary of Health and Human Services
    •Secretary of Housing and Urban Development
    •Secretary of Transportation
    •Secretary of Energy
    •Secretary of Education
    •Secretary of Veterans Affairs
    •Secretary of Homeland Security

  4. The thought of cleaning house and starting over sounds so appealing. A chance to wash away the sins of the past and begin again clean and fresh. However after the last election, I have lost all confidence that the brainwashed minions of the left would be capable of making and informed choice, and we might end up just as bad off.

  5. A very well written article. I would only disagree with you on one point, but the Constitution is pretty vague on the line of succession, so that would probably be a discussion that leaves a lot of things in the air. But once again, a very well written article, and very well researched. Kudos to you young lady.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s